Hirono Speaks Out Against Kavanaugh at Start of Confirmation Hearings


Sen. Mazie Hirono speaks during the first day of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings.


WASHINGTON – Sen. Mazie K. Hirono (D-Hawaii), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, forcefully outlined what’s at stake in the fight for the future of the Supreme Court during her opening statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday.

She stated that President Trump’s nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, would pose a threat to the constitutional rights of millions of Americans.

From Hirono’s remarks:

“Before Justice [Anthony] Kennedy retired, so many important constitutional rights were hanging in the balance, decided on narrow grounds by 5-4 votes.

“And now that Justice Kennedy has left the court, the forces opposed to workers’ rights, women’s rights, LGBTQ rights, voting rights, civil rights of all kinds, and environmental protections are eager to secure a solid majority on the court to support their right-wing views.

“These ultra-right-wing forces have been working for decades to prepare for this moment because they know that a single vote from one justice is all it would take to radically change the direction of our country.

“It could take just one vote on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, and deny women control over their reproductive rights.

“It could take just one vote to declare the ACA’s [Affordable Care Act’s] pre-existing condition protections unconstitutional.

“It could take just one vote to dismantle environmental protections that keep our air safe to breathe and our water clean to drink.

“It could take just one vote to dismantle common sense gun safety laws that keep our communities safe.

“And it could take just one vote to further erode protections for working people and unions.

“Since this nomination was announced, I have been asked many times why the Democrats would even bother going through the motions, when we know that our Republican colleagues will do anything to support this administration’s judicial nominees.

“There are battles worth fighting regardless of the outcome. A lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court who will provide the fifth vote on issues impacting the lives of every working American is a battle worth fighting.”

Hirono’s full remarks are included below.

=*=

Dana Sabraw.

Michael Baylson.

Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Colleen Kollar Kotelly.

Naomi Reice Buchwald.

John Bates.

Derrick Kahala Watson.

These are the names of some of the federal judges across this country who have vindicated my faith in the rule of law over the last year and a half.

These are the women and men, appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents,

Who ordered the government to reunite parents with the children ripped from their arms at the border;

Who rejected attempts to deny federal funds to cities refusing to be drawn into the war on immigrants;

Who stopped executive orders aimed at kneecapping public sector unions;

Who stopped the implementation of an ugly ban on transgender Americans serving in our military;

Who ruled that public officials cannot block citizens from their Twitter feeds; and,

Who stopped the government from banning Muslims from entering the U.S.

These judges stood firm in defense of the Constitution, the American values it expresses, and the system of checks and balances it enshrines.

At this moment of peril for our democracy, it is these judges, and others like them, who have pushed back against the efforts of a president eager to wield unlimited and unchecked power.

In normal times we would be here today to determine the fitness of a nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States chosen for his or her legal talent and reputation for fairness.

But these are not normal times.

Instead, we are here to decide whether or not to rubber-stamp Donald Trump’s choice of a pre-selected political ideologue, nominated precisely because he believes a sitting president should be shielded from civil lawsuits, criminal investigation, and prosecution, no matter the facts.

Let’s not forget. During his campaign, Donald Trump needed to shore up support from the Republican base who questioned whether he was sufficiently conservative.

To help, he turned to the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation to build a pre-approved list of names, and promised to pick from among them when selecting nominees for the Supreme Court.

These groups are long-standing right-wing organizations that advocate for conservative causes and legal positions.

The Heritage Foundation focuses on developing policy to, among other things, oppose climate change, repeal the Affordable Care Act, and reduce regulations for big business.

The Federalist Society focuses on changing the American legal system to align with an ultra-conservative interpretation of the Constitution, including the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

When given the opportunity to nominate a new Supreme Court Justice, Donald Trump did exactly as he promised.

He did not select someone who demonstrates independence and fidelity to the rule of law.

Instead, Donald Trump selected a pre-approved name in order to guarantee a 5th vote for his dangerous anti-worker, anti-consumer, anti-women, pro-corporate, and anti-environment agenda.

And Donald Trump selected Brett Kavanaugh from this list for an even more specific reason. The president is trying as hard as he can to protect himself from the independent, impartial, and dogged investigation of his abuse of power, before the walls close in on him entirely.

Because if there’s one thing we know about Donald Trump, it is that he is committed to self-preservation every minute, every hour, every day.

Judge Kavanaugh’s appointment should be considered in a broader context. The president has been packing our courts with ideologically-driven judges who come to the bench with firm positions and clear agendas, who then go on to rule in ways consistent with those agendas.

For example:

Trump nominee James Ho – now a judge on the 5th Circuit – has written in favor of unlimited campaign contributions and, in another case, publicly aired his personal views in opposition to abortion.

Trump nominee Don Willet – now a judge on the 5th Circuit – has already voted to curtail the independence of a federal agency that helped rescue the economy after the mortgage crisis of 2008.